Statement by CII Executive Director Glenn Davis on the SEC's Proposed Rescission of Rule 14a-8
Original HTML
Statement by CII Executive Director Glenn Davis on the SEC's Proposed Rescission of Rule 14a-8
WASHINGTON, Sept. 16, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Let this moment settle in: The SEC, created for the purpose of protecting investors in the aftermath of the Crash of 1929, today proposed to rescind a World War II-era rule protecting shareholders' ability to suggest ideas to improve the companies they own.
Yes, shareholder proposals can be a source of embarrassment when they reveal a disconnect between shareholders' and managers' understandings of what matters to long-term performance; and sometimes trigger compromise before a vote takes place. That is a feature of strong capital markets, not a basis for a government agency to swat a fly with a sledgehammer.
The proposed rescission is a solution in search of a problem. Nearly all shareholder proposals are non-binding, which means they merely give corporate directors data to make better-informed decisions. Company costs related to shareholder proposals trace largely to self-imposed expenses such as pursuing legal cover to exclude proposals from ballots or funding campaigns to get out the "against" votes. Most publicly traded companies face zero shareholder proposals in a given year.
Could Rule 14a-8 be improved? Sure. But the SEC proposed rescinding the rule in its entirety, with fingers crossed that state legislators and corporate directors will develop a patchwork of new rules resulting in something better. Spoiler alert: That patchwork will launch a new race to the bottom in state corporate law and result in a dramatic reduction in shareholders who qualify as proponents, notwithstanding smaller investors' history of putting forward many of the most highly supported proposals.
CII will speak publicly and repeatedly to defend Rule 14a-8. We encourage all market participants to do their part in this effort. It's not about whether you agree or disagree with the substance of particular shareholder proposals. It's about preserving broad shareholder expression as a vital part of robust capital markets.
About CII: The Council of Institutional Investors (CII) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan association of U.S. asset owners, primarily pension funds, state and local entities charged with investing public assets, endowments and foundations, with combined global assets that exceed $5.6 trillion. CII's associate members include non-U.S. asset owners with more than $6.6 trillion in global assets, and a range of asset managers with more than $90 trillion in global assets under management. CII is a leading voice for effective corporate governance, strong shareowner rights and sensible financial rules that foster fair, transparent and vibrant capital markets.
SOURCE Council of Institutional Investors
Share this article
Original Summary
<p>WASHINGTON, Sept. 16, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Let this moment settle in: The SEC, created for the purpose of protecting investors in the aftermath of the Crash of 1929, today proposed to rescind a World War II-era rule protecting shareholders' ability to suggest ideas to improve the...</p>
Generated Article_json
{"target_audience": "b2b", "is_medical": false, "ai_generated_title": "CII Blasts SEC Plan to Rescind Shareholder Proposal Rule 14a-8", "body_html": "<p><strong>Washington -- [CURRENT_DATE] --</strong> The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed rescinding Rule 14a-8, a World War II-era regulation that governs shareholders' ability to submit proposals to the companies they own, drawing immediate condemnation from the Council of Institutional Investors (CII).</p><h5>CII calls the SEC proposal a \"solution in search of a problem\"</h5><p>CII Executive Director Glenn Davis argues that nearly all shareholder proposals are non-binding, serving only to give corporate directors additional data for decision-making. He notes that most publicly traded companies face zero shareholder proposals in any given year, undercutting the rationale for a full rescission.</p><h5>CII says company costs stem from self-imposed legal and campaign spending, not the rule itself</h5><p>According to CII, expenses tied to shareholder proposals largely trace to companies pursuing legal action to exclude proposals from ballots or funding campaigns to defeat them, rather than costs inherent to Rule 14a-8 itself.</p><h5>CII warns rescission could trigger a state-level \"race to the bottom\"</h5><p>Davis warns that eliminating Rule 14a-8 entirely would leave a regulatory vacuum, with state legislators and corporate directors left to craft a patchwork of replacement rules. CII predicts this would sharply reduce the number of shareholders who qualify as proponents, despite smaller investors' history of introducing many of the most highly supported proposals.</p><h5>CII commits to a sustained public campaign against the rescission</h5><p>CII states it will \"speak publicly and repeatedly to defend Rule 14a-8\" and is calling on market participants to join the effort, framing the issue as one of preserving shareholder expression rather than debating the merits of any specific proposal.</p><p>CII represents U.S. asset owners with combined global assets exceeding $5.6 trillion, alongside associate members holding more than $6.6 trillion and asset managers with over $90 trillion in assets under management.</p>", "meta_description": "CII condemns SEC's proposed rescission of shareholder proposal Rule 14a-8, warning of a state-level regulatory race to the bottom for investor rights.", "seo_keywords": "SEC Rule 14a-8, shareholder proposals, Council of Institutional Investors, corporate governance, shareholder rights, capital markets regulation", "companies": ["Council of Institutional Investors"], "industries": ["Financial Services"], "markets_regions": ["United States"], "news_type": ["regulatory_update"], "themes": ["regulatory_compliance", "shareholder_rights"], "products": [], "events": [], "cta_text": "Read CII's full statement on the SEC's proposed rescission of Rule 14a-8.", "learn_more": "", "fact_check": {"accuracy_score": 100, "legal_risk": "low", "corrections_made": [], "recommendation": "publish"}}
Content Hash (SHA-256, erste 32 hex)
51a256559540d066878209c1397a4fab